I'm a totally newbie, so forgive me. Does the antagonist need to be a person? I mean, can it be a concept? I am writing something based on my own experience as an American expatriate married to an Israeli. Moroccan Israeli, at that. Sort of a combo of Greek Wedding but darker stuff as in Who wants to be a Millionaire.
It obviously isn't hollywood mainstream, but I hope it is moving and right on the mark in certain messy areas of life as a Jew.
So, back to my question, can the antagonist be a concept such as secular humanism vs traditional religion? Or must it be a person or persons who represent these conflicting ideals?
I hope that makes sense. If not, an example: in the US, religion is very much at least outwardly, respected. One sees someone with a red dot on the forehead, a turban, or a cross and they're ok. We work side-by-side with all walks of people who's religious notions have no bearing on their ability to do my taxes or be my doctor, etc. that isn't to say whispers and jokes don't occur, but we're kind enough, cool enough and liberal enough to hide it, LOL.
However, here in Israel, we are indeed well-known as a vocal and outspoken people. If someone thinks I'm silly and brainwashed for being a RELIGIOUS Jew, in any professional setting, including teaching (gasp) they will clearly let that message be known. Shocking, at least to me - a nice gal from California who figures people will believe, or not, whatever they will.
So, must I have one person represent this tension? It is an obstacle to the protagonist's journey, afterall. Or can I let the accumulated effect of the bulk of the message from many sources BE my antagonist?
Hope that makes sense and many many thanks to your wonderful site. After reading it most of the day, I'm feeling hopeful I might, MIGHT, be able to pull this off. I hope.
rut